![]() |
Home | My Books | Competition | News | Activities | For Parents and Teachers | Links | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|

ArticlesArticles from a selection I have written for The Times Educational Supplement
Skills TestsComputerised QTS skills tests in numeracy and literacy were introduced in February 2001 for all those seeking to qualify as a teacher. The ICT skills test began in September 2001. Since 1 May 2002, students have needed to pass all three skills tests before they can be awarded QTS. Back in the mists of time, when I qualified, there were no skills tests as such. A certain level of numeracy and literacy was assumed to have been achieved by passing O levels in the subjects required. This is no longer, it seems, sufficient proof. Sometimes, however, on the 'other side of the fence' as a lecturer, marking assignments, and as a classroom teacher with a student on placement, I have wondered whether the O level/GCSE requirement was indeed enough to prove that a student was 'numerate' and 'literate.' Trust me - it can be quite alarming to see spelling mistakes 'writ large' on a whiteboard in front of a class of children. Teachers need to be 'educated folk' - or they pass on their own mistakes to a whole new generation. Of course, lecturers try to ensure that students have access to materials and experiences that not only prepare them to teach, but also increase their own subject knowledge. In the full - throttle world of initial teacher training, this is not a very realistic option. From personal experience teaching on a Primary PGCE course, I know that students are worried about their own levels of understanding in subject areas such as maths, English and science - and there is not the time during taught sessions to provide students with everything they need to know. Students are given vast amounts of reading to complete in order to expand their own subject knowledge, in addition to assignments, preparation for school experiences, job applications…so it is perhaps little wonder that the added stress of the skills tests is a real burden for some students. With helplines, benchmark tests and lists of suggested texts to support learning - why do students find the idea of the skills tests so stressful? A whole new set of terrifying 'Skills Tests Urban Myths' have sprung up, telling of students sobbing and swearing, losing it completely and running amock in the test centres - but what is the reality? I asked some of my students to tell me about their own experiences of the tests.
The above are the thoughts of students who took the skills tests this year - so if they are not difficult, why do the skills tests cause such angst? Students felt that the tests added stress and took up valuable time that could have been spent more usefully elsewhere.
If we look at the results of the results for 2000/2001, there are not many students failing the skills tests. Up to 30 August 2001, 99% of students passed the literacy tests and 98% passed the numeracy tests. And students can keep on taking the test until they achieve the 60 per cent pass mark, either by painstaking preparation or even just luck. So what are the tests for? Are they a valid method of determining whether students are numerate, literate and have sufficient ICT skills to function as a teacher? Or are they, as many students feel, just another hoop to jump through? FACT: Know Your Enemy!When I was at school, I sat many, many exams. My mother's advice as I left the house always consisted of the same phrase - 'Do you have a clean hankie?' Although I always did, I was never quite sure why it was so important - was it a talisman to offer me good luck? Or was it so I had something to sob into if the going was hard? The TTA website is perhaps a more useful tool for students approaching their skills tests - make use of it!
The TTA WebsiteThe TTA website helpfully offers a glossary of words for students approaching the Skills Tests. Useful though it is, students may find that this glossary may have more practical applications:
Reproduced by kind permission of: Times Educational Supplement. |
![]() |
Design & Hosting by Webtree Authoring | © 2010 Lynn Hugging Cooper | ![]() |